No token. ArcScore has no token, no airdrop, no presale. Any token or account using the ArcScore or DexScorer name is fraudulent. Ratings cannot be bought.

Proof register

Checks of the figures shown on arcscore.xyz: how each is computed, the independent method used to check it, the result and the date — failed checks included. Each row records the method at the date of its check; where a method changed later, the current one is on How it works. Updated 2026-11-11 10:15 UTC.

MetricHow it is computedControl methodResultStatus
USDC on Arc (Pulse)
pulse tile
USDC totalSupply() eth_callindependent RPC read + DeFiLlama stablecoin TVLRPC 510.67M vs tile 510.40M (0.05%, timing); DeFiLlama 509.5M vs 511.5Mverified
2026-10-05
USDC flow 24h net (bridge)
pulse tile
Δ totalSupply over last 24h of blocks (two eth_calls)mint−burn from Transfer events from/to 0x0 per 2000-block window; reconciliation |net−(in−out)| ≤ max($50k,1%)per-window Δsupply == mint−burn exactly; 15:02Z coverage 87/87, net 16.82M == in−out 16.82M. Before 05.10 13:40Z the tile counted only CCTP TokenMessenger (wrong, +$53M) — fixedverified
2026-10-05
USDC flow breakdown (in/out/CCTP)
pulse tile
Transfer events USDC 0x0 + CCTP MessageSentshown only when all windows complete AND reconciled with Δsupply; else last reconciled 'as of HH:MM'hidden automatically on mismatch (guard live since 14:35Z)verified
2026-10-05
Liquidity (V3 pools)
token cards, ranking, Pulse sums
USDC balance of the main V3 pool × 2ratio USDC-side/liq = 0.50 for TOLLY/XAUM/cirBTC; label 'USDC side $X × 2' on cardsdefinition verified; V4 'depth ×4' estimates capped at USDC×2 (FIAT $91k→$5.3k, ARCADE $13k→$0.9k)verified
2026-10-05
Liquidity (V4 unverified reads)
Pulse 'Rated liquidity'
PoolManager reserve read + quoter checkunverified reads excluded from chain-wide sums; never replace a verified read <6hARGUS copy $7.29M excluded ('excl. $7.29M unverified (1)')verified
2026-10-05
Price
token cards, mcap
own pool read (V3 slot0 / V4 quoter)Uniswap quoter 10 USDC round trip; GeckoTerminal for non-Uniswap venues7 tokens checked 05.10 18:0xZ: within ±2% (DUKE, MALA, ARCBAT, ARCASH, Architects); ARCAT dyorswap GT 0.0001046 vs 0.000105; SOLON V4 GT FDV $78k vs $73k circverified
2026-10-05
Supply / burned
token cards, mcap
totalSupply() + balanceOf(0xdEaD, 0x0)independent RPC calls8 top tokens 05.10 (audit E) + 7 small-cap B tokens 18:0xZ: equal to 0.01 ppverified
2026-10-05
Token age
cards, posts
arcts ageSec (contract creation)contract creation block by eth_getCode binary search7/7 tokens equal to 0.1 day (05.10 18:5xZ). Note: GT 'created' = pool age (14.09 mainnet), different definitionverified
2026-10-05
Transactions 24h
pulse tile
sampled 60 blocks × block rateindependent 160-block sample0.91× — both estimates; tile now says 'about ±10%'verified
2026-10-05
Volume 24h
cards, ranking
own swap index (Uniswap V3/V4 pools only)GeckoTerminal h24 for cirBTC0.60× GT because GT includes other venues — label 'own index: Uniswap V3/V4 pools only'verified
2026-10-05
New pools 24h
pulse tile
PoolManager Initialize + V3 PoolCreated, pool-keyed watcher, cursor stops on failureindependent getLogs scan 2000-block windowsscan ≥1435 vs tile 1153 before fix → watcher rebuilt + 24h backfill → 1549. History cut at method changeverified
2026-10-05
Wash / round-trip share
cards, score (trading criterion, caps)
own swap index: wallets that bought AND sold within the daysame method recomputed per UTC day from index.db for ARCMAN (28.09–05.10: 94/92/94/92/94/83/91/85)consistent with score ev (7-day mean 90–91%). Second independent method (pool Swap events re-scan) still TODOpartial
2026-10-05
Top wallets / concentration
cards (control clusters, top10)
balances from own Transfer indexRPC balanceOf for top walletsCOOL 8/8, ARCMAN 5/8, TOLLY 4/8 within ±0.1%; rest = index lag ~21 min. Clusters depend on transfer history completeness (see holders)partial
2026-10-05
Holders (own index)
cards, ranking, score (holder quality)
balances > 0 from Transfer index (backfill from creation + live)recount from scratch from Transfer events (repair_holders.py, independent code path); spot check of top holders via RPC balanceOf; daily sample recount of young tokens (daily_proofs.py)FIXED 06.10 04:00 UTC: full-history recount of 97 tokens from Transfer events (20,883 requests, 0 failed windows) applied to the index. 27 tokens were off by >3% in both directions (CRCL 1,014→3,883, LONG 1,622→5,983, NOAH 207→91). Top-8 holders of 8 tokens checked against balanceOf: exact except pools/active traders. Cause: the 27.09 backfill dropped chunks silently and still marked tokens complete (fixed). Note: a partial recount is NOT a lower bound (lost chunks also create phantom holders); arc-scan is not a valid control for dust-farmed tokens (it counts sub-1e-6 dust).verified
2026-10-06
24h change
ranking, cards
arcts.fun change24h with GeckoTerminal sanity (|diff|>100 → GT)NOT yet independently verified against own VWAPthird-party; do not use in posts without own VWAP checkpartial
2026-10-05
Rug flags
cards, alerts
pool USDC drained vs liq0 + priceRPC USDC balance of rugged poolsPOLL/HIMS/ARCADE/WORM/WAGMI: $35/$220/$449/$0/$321 vs liq0 $5k–57k — confirmedverified
2026-10-05
Uniswap / stable TVL tiles
pulse
PoolManager USDC balance; stablecoin supplyRPC 3.249M vs 3.255M; DeFiLlama 543.6M vs 548.0Mwithin 1%verified
2026-10-05
supply
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyEURC: site 5944224 vs control 0 (-100.0%)FAILED
2026-10-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyCRCL: site 42070 vs control 34150 (-18.8%)FAILED
2026-10-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py$ARCAT: site 14265 vs control 0 (-100.0%)FAILED
2026-10-08
price (quoter, incl. 1% fee)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyCOOL: site 0.001284807191822838 vs control 0.0011866804001662821 (-7.6%)FAILED
2026-10-08
price (quoter, incl. 1% fee)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWARP: site 2.11665e-05 vs control 0.0007492885676405038 (+3440.0%)FAILED
2026-10-09
liquidity (V3 pool) — quoter-depth override
FIAT 0x12dd36a1, ARCADE 0x…
liq_series.jsonl 7 d: source flips on V3 pool idson-chain USDC balance of the V3 pool (direct read) + eth_getLogs USDC transfersFIAT shown $91,180 instead of $5,259 for ~20 h (08.10 21:00 → 09.10 16:30, score 53 vs ~20); ARCADE $13,266 instead of ~$893 (intermittent 02.10 → 09.10). Cause: 28.09 sanity readfix (quoter ±10% depth ×4, buy-side) overrode the direct V3 reserve read. Fix 09.10 19:15: override restricted to V4 pool ids. No other V3 tokens affected (7-day scan).?
2026-10-09 17:05 UTC
grade — caps without memory (wash/bot cap tied to the 24 h window; holders counted by balance)
EXIT 0x7036e5bc… (B73, rank #10 on 09.10)
own index, whole token life: swaps per wallet, identical-balance clusters, holders that ever boughtclean A/B of old vs new scorer on the same data snapshot (110 tokens)EXIT held B73 although 97% of all-time volume (39,548 swaps) came from 22 bot wallets that stopped on 06.10, 1,270 of 2,494 holders ≥$1 hold an identical scripted balance (135,500 / 70,942 / 678,624 tokens) and only 35 holders ever bought. The wash cap (02.10) required ≥30 traders or ≥100 tx in the last 24 h, so it vanished when the bots stopped. Fix 09.10 20:15: lifetime memory R1 (bot volume ≥80% → cap 50, ≥90% → 45), R2 (identical balances leave the holder count; ≥25% → cap 79…50), R3 (<5% of holders ever bought, full history → cap 60), 7-day wash mean counts as data. A/B: only EXIT changed (73 B → 45 D); 109 tokens unchanged.?
2026-10-09 18:09 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
DUKE 45D→67B (liq $68,701, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-09 19:16 UTC
price (quoter, incl. 1% fee)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pycirBTC: site 82579.41794907859 vs control 38461538.461538464 (+46475.2%)FAILED
2026-10-10
daily price control (quoter) — wrong fee tier
cirBTC, daily check 10.10 06:00
QuoterV2 at the 1% tierQuoterV2 at the main pool's own fee tier (pool.fee() = 0.01%)the 06:00 'fail' (site $82.6k vs control $38.5M) was our CONTROL quoting a thin 1% side pool; at the main pool's tier the control gives $82,727 vs site $82,774 (0.06%). The site value was correct. Control fixed 10.10 08:20.?
2026-10-10 06:16 UTC
holder history — gap between backfill and live tracking
RADAR, DIVIDEND (10.10); ARCANUS/oBrain/AKIT (09.10)
own transfer indexgapfill.py: Transfer logs for exactly [xfer_start, tracking start)tokens tracked after the history backfill had an unfilled block range; they were correctly shown NOT RATED but never repaired. gapfill.py now fills the range every cycle (RADAR +110 transfers → 59 holders; DIVIDEND +833 → 96).?
2026-10-10 06:16 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 72B→55B (liq $42,400, -13%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-10 13:31 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCASH 71B→55B (liq $25,302, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-11 10:02 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCORA 40D→55D (liq $40,179, -3%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-11 14:17 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 74B→50B (liq $37,114, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-12 03:02 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 50C→75C (liq $39,870, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-12 16:02 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARGUS 49C→85A (liq $448,571, -1%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-12 21:01 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 50C→77C (liq $40,791, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-12 22:31 UTC
bridge net vs in−out
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyUSDC: site 816556 vs control 1460230 (+78.8%)FAILED
2026-10-13
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
DIVIDEND 75B→50B (liq $89,200, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-13 16:32 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCAT 73B→58B (liq $41,146, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-13 22:47 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
VIRTUAL 50C→72C (liq $497,628, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-14 22:17 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCX10 43D→63D (liq $43,687, -13%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-15 00:17 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCAT 71B→55B (liq $39,116, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-15 07:17 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
VIRTUAL 50C→71C (liq $510,174, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-16 14:01 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ASTOCK 55C→77C (liq $88,868, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-16 16:58 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCAT 70B→55B (liq $39,365, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-16 21:29 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
HPAWS 55C→35C (liq $18,629, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 01:20 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
PANTHER 53C→35C (liq $10,148, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 01:34 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
HYIP 54C→35C (liq $10,114, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 02:27 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCHI 55C→38C (liq $10,921, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 02:55 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
onboard 55C→40C (liq $30,628, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 03:58 UTC
holders (recount from Transfer events)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyonboard: site 656 vs control 105 (-84.0%)FAILED
2026-10-17
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCAT 72B→55B (liq $39,166, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 12:38 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCUS 74B→55B (liq $33,638, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-17 17:45 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
VIRTUAL 68B→50B (liq $500,699, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-18 01:56 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCUS 55C→71C (liq $25,660, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-18 12:18 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
AI 55C→73C (liq $29,275, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-18 13:39 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
WAVE 59C→40C (liq $20,279, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-18 16:32 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCAT 55C→70C (liq $40,066, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-19 02:03 UTC
bridge net vs in−out
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyUSDC: site 1710767 vs control 2029878 (+18.7%)FAILED
2026-10-19
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyTERRA: site 184 vs control 184 (60 wallets differ: 18 only ours, 18 only explorer, 24 balance differences (tolerance 3) — counts at 06:00 recorded only as a %; breakdown from the 07:40 UTC re-run. Explorer = on-chain balanceOf for every differing wallet: our index missed TERRA transfers)FAILED
2026-10-19
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWETH: site 950 vs control 1399 (+47.3%)FAILED
2026-10-19
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyEURC: site 67046 vs control 71594 (+6.8%)FAILED
2026-10-19
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 50C→73C (liq $27,790, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewalarm sent; cause to be identified?
2026-10-19 06:17 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
VIRTUAL 50C→65C (liq $508,525, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-19 19:57 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCASH 61C→40C (liq $21,348, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-20 07:54 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
CYFT 36D→51D (liq $2,420, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-20 17:22 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCT 64B→49D (liq $41,882, -6%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-20 22:04 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCVEIN 58C→43C (liq $20,563, -6%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-21 03:22 UTC
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyMEMESPAD: site 1022 vs control 929 (876 wallets differ: 159 only ours, 66 only explorer, 651 balance differences (tolerance 5))FAILED
2026-10-21
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyXAUM: site 1096 vs control 1587 (1027 wallets differ: 8 only ours, 499 only explorer, 520 balance differences (tolerance 5))FAILED
2026-10-21
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCVEIN 40D→55D (liq $20,784, +6%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-21 12:42 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
VIRTUAL 63C→48C (liq $513,357, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-21 15:13 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCVEIN 40D→55D (liq $19,955, -0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-21 20:15 UTC
price (quoter, main-pool fee 1%)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyPOLL: site 0.000284096530551573 vs control 0.00044660401447452625 (+57.2%)FAILED
2026-10-22
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCOON: site 3900 vs control 3894 (30 wallets differ: 13 only ours, 7 only explorer, 10 balance differences (tolerance 19))FAILED
2026-10-23
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
AF 71B→40D (liq $50,800, -15%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-23 07:43 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLIGHT 68B→40D (liq $61,737, -2%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-23 15:55 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLOAK 62C→40C (liq $18,122, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-23 16:28 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLOAK 58C→42C (liq $17,374, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-24 01:42 UTC
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyTERRA: site 184 vs control 184 (60 wallets differ: 18 only ours, 18 only explorer, 24 balance differences (tolerance 3))FAILED
2026-10-24
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLOAK 40D→60D (liq $15,201, -2%); ARCVEIN 40D→56D (liq $11,345, -4%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-24 15:58 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 40D→58D (liq $30,760, +7%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-24 20:08 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLIGHT 67B→52B (liq $56,880, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-24 22:27 UTC
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyNVDA: site 1.0629 vs control 1.0 (-5.9%)FAILED
2026-10-26
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 158 vs control 153 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-10-26
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
FUCI 40D→57D (liq $12,071, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-26 15:50 UTC
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyNVDA: site 1.0629 vs control 1.0 (-5.9%)FAILED
2026-10-27
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 157 vs control 152 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-10-27
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyTERRA: site 185 vs control 186 (59 wallets differ: 17 only ours, 18 only explorer, 24 balance differences (tolerance 3))FAILED
2026-10-28
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 59 vs control 87 (30 wallets differ: 1 only ours, 29 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 3))FAILED
2026-10-28
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyNVDA: site 1.0655 vs control 1.0 (-6.1%)FAILED
2026-10-28
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 158 vs control 153 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-10-28
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-10-29
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyNVDA: site 1.0658 vs control 1.0 (-6.2%)FAILED
2026-10-29
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 157 vs control 151 (-3.8%)FAILED
2026-10-29
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
AF 53C→69C (liq $49,297, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-10-29 12:29 UTC
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyXAUM: site 1105 vs control 1591 (1020 wallets differ: 11 only ours, 497 only explorer, 512 balance differences (tolerance 5))FAILED
2026-10-30
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-10-30
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 156 vs control 151 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-10-30
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyVIRTUAL: site 20058 vs control 40109 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-10-31
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWETH: site 218172 vs control 80088 (-63.3%)FAILED
2026-10-31
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCANINE: site 6349 vs control 12697 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-10-31
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyXAUM: site 82983 vs control 165944 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-10-31
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCBAT: site 8263 vs control 16418 (+98.7%)FAILED
2026-10-31
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCT: site 6909 vs control 13780 (+99.4%)FAILED
2026-10-31
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyEURC: site 68368 vs control 72818 (6339 wallets differ: 233 only ours, 4683 only explorer, 1423 balance differences (tolerance 341))FAILED
2026-10-31
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-10-31
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 156 vs control 151 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-10-31
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
SOLON 71B→55B (liq $13,749, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-01 03:53 UTC
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pycirBTC: site 5876549 vs control 11228801 (+91.1%)FAILED
2026-11-01
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyXAUM: site 83530 vs control 167039 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-01
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCAT: site 18849 vs control 37530 (+99.1%)FAILED
2026-11-01
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyCOOL: site 56242 vs control 111216 (+97.7%)FAILED
2026-11-01
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyPOLL: site 20942 vs control 36146 (+72.6%)FAILED
2026-11-01
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 9175 vs control 18350 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-01
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyXAUM: site 1064 vs control 1545 (964 wallets differ: 13 only ours, 494 only explorer, 457 balance differences (tolerance 5))FAILED
2026-11-01
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-01
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 155 vs control 150 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-11-01
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyNOAH: site 5353 vs control 10705 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-02
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 9175 vs control 18350 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-02
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWPAY: site 76855 vs control 153537 (+99.8%)FAILED
2026-11-02
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyMSS2: site 49346 vs control 98692 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-02
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyVIRTUAL: site 20095 vs control 40185 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-02
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyLONG: site 39126 vs control 78253 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-02
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-02
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 155 vs control 150 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-11-02
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCASH 55C→5F (liq $1,221, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-02 09:44 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
XAUM 5F→60C (liq $84,881, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-02 17:13 UTC
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARC: site 15594 vs control 31189 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-03
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCAT: site 18742 vs control 37337 (+99.2%)FAILED
2026-11-03
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyDUKE: site 11698 vs control 23372 (+99.8%)FAILED
2026-11-03
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyArchitects: site 13363 vs control 26725 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-03
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARGUS: site 160894 vs control 300521 (+86.8%)FAILED
2026-11-03
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyBuilders: site 7464 vs control 14923 (+99.9%)FAILED
2026-11-03
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyUNIPAD: site 1 vs control 220 (220 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 219 only explorer, 1 balance differences (tolerance 3))FAILED
2026-11-03
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-03
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 156 vs control 151 (-3.2%)FAILED
2026-11-03
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWETH: site 237399 vs control 41773 (-82.4%)FAILED
2026-11-04
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyLONG: site 39020 vs control 78039 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-04
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWPAY: site 79389 vs control 158770 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-04
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyVIRTUAL: site 19974 vs control 40014 (+100.3%)FAILED
2026-11-04
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyCOOL: site 52454 vs control 103680 (+97.7%)FAILED
2026-11-04
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyTIDE: site 18237 vs control 36589 (+100.6%)FAILED
2026-11-04
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWETH: site 1272 vs control 1646 (748 wallets differ: 79 only ours, 453 only explorer, 216 balance differences (tolerance 6))FAILED
2026-11-04
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-04
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 152 vs control 147 (-3.3%)FAILED
2026-11-04
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARC: site 15594 vs control 31189 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 9175 vs control 18350 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyTOLLY: site 102264 vs control 210461 (+105.8%)FAILED
2026-11-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyVIRTUAL: site 20181 vs control 40357 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyNOAH: site 5351 vs control 10702 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-05
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyArchitects: site 12805 vs control 25610 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-05
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pycirBTC: site 3765 vs control 6154 (3935 wallets differ: 144 only ours, 2533 only explorer, 1258 balance differences (tolerance 18))FAILED
2026-11-05
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-05
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 149 vs control 144 (-3.4%)FAILED
2026-11-05
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
DUKE 67B→50B (liq $11,895, -3%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-05 07:32 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLOAK 40D→55D (liq $3,495, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-05 15:21 UTC
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyLONG: site 38940 vs control 77879 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-06
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyPOLL: site 17321 vs control 32528 (+87.8%)FAILED
2026-11-06
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyArchitects: site 12694 vs control 25387 (+100.0%)FAILED
2026-11-06
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyWETH: site 209638 vs control 35234 (-83.2%)FAILED
2026-11-06
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyARCANINE: site 6148 vs control 12395 (+101.6%)FAILED
2026-11-06
liquidity (USDC side ×2)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyTOLLY: site 96243 vs control 192394 (+99.9%)FAILED
2026-11-06
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pycirBTC: site 3817 vs control 6196 (3930 wallets differ: 147 only ours, 2526 only explorer, 1257 balance differences (tolerance 19))FAILED
2026-11-06
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-06
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 150 vs control 145 (-3.3%)FAILED
2026-11-06
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
DUKE 50C→66C (liq $11,662, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-06 06:00 UTC
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyXAUM: site 1074 vs control 1554 (958 wallets differ: 12 only ours, 492 only explorer, 454 balance differences (tolerance 5))FAILED
2026-11-06
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pycirBTC: site 3818 vs control 6197 (3929 wallets differ: 147 only ours, 2526 only explorer, 1256 balance differences (tolerance 19))FAILED
2026-11-06
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.pyAros: site 0.7377 vs control 1.0 (+35.6%)FAILED
2026-11-06
supply reconciliation (all published)
daily check
site valuedaily_proofs.py-: site 150 vs control 145 (-3.3%)FAILED
2026-11-06
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCANUS 63B→40D (liq $8,040, -10%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-07 19:42 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCVEIN 40D→55D (liq $3,939, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-08 14:24 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ASTOCK 79A→55C (liq $64,612, -9%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-09 04:18 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
oBrain 73B→57B (liq $20,368, +0%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-10 02:50 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
ARCLIGHT 66B→40D (liq $11,689, -16%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-10 08:28 UTC
score jump ≥15 without an on-chain cause
oBrain 55C→70C (liq $19,957, +1%)
score.py watchdog (prev vs now, liq within 20%)manual reviewin morning report; cause to be identified?
2026-11-11 10:15 UTC

Daily automatic cross-check

Runs once a day on a random sample (seeded by the date), independent code path. A divergence above 3% marks the check FAILED and raises an alarm for review.

last run 2026-11-11 05:00 UTC · 38/45 ok, 0 failed, 7 warn

CheckSiteControlDiffStatus
supply EXIT999619331999619331+0.0%verified
burned EXIT78813860.078813860.0+0.0%verified
supply ARCANUS10000000001000000000+0.0%verified
burned ARCANUS28459944.31128459944.311+0.0%verified
supply AF10000000001000000000+0.0%verified
burned AF9.7179.717+0.0%verified
supply ARGUS10000000001000000000+0.0%verified
burned ARGUS78245394.77278246695.123+0.0%verified
supply TOLLY10000000001000000000+0.0%verified
burned TOLLY66921421.93466921421.934+0.0%verified
supply ARC1000000000010000000000+0.0%verified
burned ARC00.0+0.0%verified
supply TIDE10000001000000+0.0%verified
burned TIDE295992.045295992.045+0.0%verified
supply PEACH10000000001000000000+0.0%verified
burned PEACH00.0+0.0%verified
liquidity (USDC side, main pool) — site sums 2 pools VIRTUAL1907419071-0.0%verified
liquidity (USDC side, main pool) — site sums 5 pools POLL1465413832-5.6%verified
liquidity (USDC side, main pool) NOAH51805180+0.0%verified
liquidity (USDC side, main pool) — site sums 2 pools XAUM9077390762-0.0%verified
liquidity (USDC side, main pool) TIDE1858118639+0.3%verified
liquidity (USDC side, main pool) — site sums 3 pools KAIRO3011130103-0.0%verified
price (quoter, main-pool fee 1%) LONG0.00026263987224762360.00026631140542964925+1.4%verified
price (quoter) ARCAT3.733519856682908e-05n/amain pool is not Uniswap V3 (slot0 reverts) — quoter control not applicableverified
price (quoter, main-pool fee 1%) ARCT2.835149441056714e-052.864954839633474e-05+1.1%verified
price (quoter, main-pool fee 1%) KAIRO0.000237979337258955580.00024041760653305402+1.0%verified
bridge net vs in−out USDC2332347623323476+0.0%verified
USDC supply on Arc USDC13182221061318222106+0.0%verified
holders -n/an/askipped (--no-holders)partial
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) FAZE415641560 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 20)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) DUKE402140210 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 20)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) PP267526750 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 13)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) EXIT250725070 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 12)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) POTATO4454450 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 3)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) ARCLIGHT112811280 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 5)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) ARCMAN498249821 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 1 balance differences (tolerance 24)verified
holders vs explorer (Blockscout, wallet by wallet) ARCANUS413341330 wallets differ: 0 only ours, 0 only explorer, 0 balance differences (tolerance 20)verified
deployer + creation block vs explorer (all rated) -135135135/135 identicalverified
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply) cirBTC0.46411.0+115.5%partial
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply) EURC-0.49911.0+300.4%partial
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply) WETH0.77671.0+28.7%partial
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply) XAUM0.84851.0+17.9%partial
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply) GBPA-0.01.0+100000000000000.0%partial
supply reconciliation (own balances = totalSupply) Aros0.73771.0+35.6%partial
supply reconciliation (all published) -141135135 reconcile · 6 registry assets explainedverified